![]() This is a standard fantasy: spirit surpasses matter.īut the story requires the protagonist to enter the black hole, so how to overcome or solve this realistic problem? And black holes can pull any matter into elementary particles, but the film relies on a space suit and the strong spirit of the astronauts to go in. What kind of disasters in reality can destroy human plants, or the land is not mentioned at all. There is no problem with this, but once it is set, it must be followed throughout. In science fiction films, there is always a setting of capabilities that surpass the level of reality in science and technology. There is no sci-fi logic at all at the core of the movie. That is, at the beginning of the earth disaster, the father had to go to the sky, and finally the hero sent the heroine to leave the body and fall into the black hole. After all, the director is Nolan, but if you start from "hard science fiction From the perspective of "movies", the two sci-fi settings before and after it are not so "sci-fi", they are just a tool for the director to serve the father and daughter's emotions. As a science fiction movie, it has a much higher degree of completion, reaching the world's top level. This movie has been discussed many times. So, how should we treat this "science fiction"? Sci-fi movies are better, but are hard sci-fi blockbusters flawed? How should we view "Interstellar" On the contrary, it is not sci-fi to belittle "The Wandering Earth" and say that the planetary engine pushes the earth. That's what the so-called "science fiction" is, and the belittling of "Interstellar" that love can travel through dimensions is not too sci-fi. At the same time, I found that whenever "The Wandering Earth" is compared with "Interstellar", there is a problem with the two films, and everyone's discussions are more heated. Ball 2" rhythm, some problems in editing cannot be ignored.Īnd as a movie released during the Spring Festival, it will naturally deal with the plot, which is more down-to-earth but also less mysterious that science fiction should have. "Ball 2" has the strength to compete for the pinnacle of science fiction in the world, but it is a bit too much to say that it completely surpasses "Interstellar". The concept of a community with a shared future for mankind is not new, but when this concept is put on display by "Ball 2" in the whole world of science fiction films, the majestic momentum It has never appeared in any science fiction film before. The reason is that "Ball 2" is a breakthrough in the grand narrative. In my opinion, "The Wandering Earth 2" can be ranked in the first echelon, or even surpass the first echelon. There are many controversies in the comments. Wrote an article comparing "The Wandering Earth 2" and the foreign science fiction film "Interstellar" before.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |